WebDan’s City Used Cars, Inc. v. Pelkey , 133 S. Ct. 1769, 1775 (2013), that amendment provides that states may not enact or enforce laws “related to a price, WebJun 9, 2024 · 14501(c)(1); see Dan’s City Used Cars, Inc. v. Pelkey, 569 U.S. 251, 261 (2013). This Court has recognized that the identical lan-guage in the two preemption provisions—“related to a price, route, or service”—should be interpreted identi-cally. See …
DAN’S CITY USED CARS, INC. D/B/A DAN’S CITY AUTO BODY …
WebMay 14, 2013 · Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act § 14501(c)(1) does not pre-empt state-law claims stemming from the storage and disposal of a towed vehicle. Webthe scope of preemption under this statute in Dan’s City Used Cars, Inc. v. Pelkey, 569 U.S. 251, 262 (2013). The import of the Dan’s City case has been described as follows: In the most recent Supreme Court case addressing the issue, Dan's City Used Cars, Inc. v. Pelkey, the Court held that although the ICCTA's preemption flip screen mirrorless camera
Matthew Soares User US Law LII / Legal Information Institute
Dan's City Used Cars, Inc. v. Pelkey, 569 U.S. 251 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that federal laws deregulating the transportation industry do not invalidate corresponding state provisions that regulate the seizure, storage, and sale of cars by towing companies. Robert Pelkey sued Dan's City Used Cars under New Hampshire law for unlawfully selling his vehicle. A lower court raised doubts as to whether the New Hampshire stat… WebMar 20, 2013 · Dan's City contends that because none of Pelkey's claims fits within the exceptions to preemption detailed in 49 U.S.C. §§14501(c)(2), (3), and (5), his claims … WebDan’s City Used Cars, Inc. v. Pelkey, 569 U.S. 251, 260 (2013). As Justice Scalia observed of the same preemptive phrase in ERISA, “everything is related to everything else,” so if the phrase is read with a wooden literalism, the result will be “a degree of great expectations gutenberg